OBJECTIVES
1. To
understand and get familiar with the use of the Vernier caliper.
2. To
determine the least count of the Vernier caliper.
3. To
measure the dimensions of slip gauges using the Vernier caliper and calculate
the measurement errors by comparing the measured values with standard values.
4. To
analyze the sources of errors and discuss methods to minimize them.
EQUIPMENT
USED
1. Vernier
Caliper
2. Set
of slip gauges
3. Calculator
THEORY
Vernier
Caliper
A
Vernier caliper is a precision measuring instrument used to measure internal
and external dimensions as well as depths. It uses a Vernier scale, pioneered
by French mathematician Pierre Vernier in the 17th century.
Principle: Vernier caliper operates on the principle of alignment of two scales, the main scale and the Vernier scale, to interpolate between the smallest main scale divisions for finer measurements.
Construction: The Vernier caliper consists of two scale: one is fixed and the other is movable. The fixed scale, called main scale is calibrated on L-shaped frame and carries a fixed jaw. The movable scale, called Vernier scale slides over the main scale and carries a movable jaw. The large, external jaws are used to measure external diameter or width of an object and the small internal jaws are used to measure internal diameter of an object. The depth measuring blade extends from one end of the caliper, which is used to measure the depths of an object or a hole. A locking screw is used to stop moveable parts, allowing measurements to be easily transferred.
Least Count: It is the
difference between value of main scale division and vernier scale division.
i.e.
L.C. = Value of smallest division on main scale –
Value of smallest division on Vernier scale
If
there are N Vernier scale divisions and N-1 main scale divisions then,
N
VSD = (N-1) MSD
1
VSD = (N-1)/N MSD
L.C.
= 1 MSD – 1 VSD
= 1 - (N-1)/N MSD
L.C. = 1/N MSD
The
total reading of the Vernier caliper = MSR + (VSC * LC)
Errors
i.
Zero error occurs if the zero mark on the Vernier
scale is not aligned with the main scale zero.
ii.
Parallax error is caused by not reading the scale from
a perpendicular angle.
iii.
The error happens due to misalignment of the object
between the jaws.
iv.
Contact pressure either too tight or too loose may
lead to inaccurate measurements.
v.
Repeated use
can wear down the jaws, causing errors.
Slip
Gauge
Slip
gauges or gauge blocks are universally accepted end standard of length in
industry. These were introduced by Johanson and are also called as Johanson
Gauges. Slip gauges are rectangular blocks of high-grade steel with
exceptionally close tolerances. The cross-sections of these gauges are 9mm x 30
mm for sizes up to 10 mm and 9 mm x 35 mm for larger sizes. Any two slips when
perfectly clean may be wrung together. The gap between two wrung slips is only
of the order of 0.00635 microns which is negligible.
1. Calibration:
The Vernier caliper was calibrated by ensuring it was
set to zero when the jaws were fully closed. Our caliper was free from zero
error and Vernier zero mark properly coincided with the main scale zero.
2. Measurement
of slip gauges: The two jaws of the Vernier caliper were cleaned and
slip gauges were placed in between the measuring jaws. Each of the 10 slip
gauges was measured using the Vernier caliper. The main scale reading (MSR) and
the Vernier scale reading (VSR)
which
exactly coincided with any line on the main scale were recorded and the total
measurement was calculated.
3. Error
Calculation: The error for each slip gauge was calculated by
comparing the measured value with the standard value of the slip gauge.
Error
= Measured Value – Standard Value
PRECAUTIONS
1. Ensure
the Vernier caliper is properly calibrated before use.
2. Clean
the caliper and the object to be measured to avoid dirt and debris.
3. Apply
consistent, gentle pressure when closing the jaws to avoid the contact pressure
error.
4. Read
the scale directly from above to avoid parallax error.
5. Handle
the caliper gently to prevent wear and tear.
OBSERVATION
Observation Table 1
Observation Table 2
CALCULATION
Least
Count of Vernier Caliper
One
small division of main scale = 1 mm
50
VSD = 49 MSD
1
VSD = 49/50 MSD
L.C.
= 1 MSD – 1 VSD
= 1 - 49/50 MSD
Or,
L.C. = 0.02 * 1 mm
∴ L.C. = 0.02 mm
For
Observation Table 1
For
slip gauge 1:
Main
Scale Reading (MSR) = 1.0 mm
Vernier
Scale Reading (VSR) = 5
Least
Count (LC) = 0.02 mm
Total
Measurement (TM) = 1.0 mm + (5 mm * 0.02 mm) = 1.10 mm
Standard
gauge value = 1.10 mm
Error
(E) = 1.10 mm – 1.10 mm = 0.00 mm
Similarly,
the calculations were performed for each of the slip gauges.
ANALYSIS
The
minor errors observed in the measurements (ranging from 0.00 mm to 0.02 mm)
suggest that the Vernier caliper is generally accurate but not perfectly so. The
least count of 0.02 mm means that any measurement must be rounded to the
nearest 0.02 mm. This limitation is particularly evident when measuring gauge
blocks with dimensions that fall between the increments that the caliper can
measure accurately.
The
consistency of the errors suggests that while the caliper may have minor
systematic inaccuracies, it is precise within its limitations. The errors,
though minor, highlight the importance of understanding and accounting for the
limitations of measurement tools. In applications requiring higher precision,
alternative tools with a smaller least count or digital calipers might be
necessary.
DISCUSSION
The measurements taken using the Vernier caliper showed minor
errors ranging from 0.00 mm to 0.02 mm. These errors can be attributed to
factors such as slight misalignment, parallax error while reading the scale,
and contact pressure error.
The least count of 0.02 mm provided reasonable precision for
the measurements. When measuring gauge blocks with an odd hundredths digit, the
caliper consistently showed an error due to the least count limitation. Regular
calibration and proper handling of the Vernier caliper are essential to
maintain accuracy.
CONCLUSION
The
experiment successfully demonstrated the use of a Vernier caliper in measuring
slip gauges. The calculated least count was 0.02 mm, and the measurement errors
were minimal, validating the precision of the instrument. Understanding and
mitigating potential sources of error is crucial for obtaining accurate
measurements.




Comments
Post a Comment